3 Concepts Of The APOCALYPSE Could End The World [Study]
The end of the world has been predicted in 2012, a disastrous theory that frightened lots of people yet it didn't occur. However, specialists have claimed that it is an alarming possibilitythat might turn to being real soon.
Scientists provided the three major essential risks for human race. These are pandemics, extreme climate change, and nuclear war. The worldwide rulers need to have an urgent action to narrow down the alarming effects of each, Daily Mail reported.
Oxford University publishes the latest report of warning against the end of the world. The authors appointed the global community to identify the significance of every nation in the future. This is also to point out the ways on how to lessen the three threats.
The Future of Humanity Institute (FHI), which is a division of the Faculty of Philosophy at Oxford University, conducted the new report. Researchers talked to professionals in their field, after the interview, the experts presented the essential actions that could minimize these three potential dangers.
The report was released at the Finnish Embassy in London. It states that leaders must focus on the management of these ultimate ailments like ebola and Zika. These growing diseases produce the greatest health risk, because they came from strange pathogens without existing vaccines.
"As the ebola and zika crises showed, managing pandemics is a global responsibility," lead author Sebastian Farquhar said. An extensive planning is still to be done nationwide. A minimal care will result to worst-case situations, including hazards from methodically engineered pathogens, he added.
The needs for a more focused attention on biological weapons are also emphasized in the report. Nuclear bombs are the topmost disastrous weapons on Earth since its ability to wreck ities totally just in seconds.
Climate change, on the other hand, could be administered through geoengineering. This process includes the liberation of sulphates in the stratosphere to decrease the Earth's temperature. According to the authors, a bigger attention is required for the establishment of geoengineering analysis. Unfortunately, there is no presently fit-for-purpose governing body to conduct the risk.