Lawsuit Claims St. Ives Apricot Scrub Is Bad For The Skin

• comments
• 
• 

The St. Ives Apricot Scrub has grown to be very popular over the years and has served so many people as their primary facial care product. The scrub is known for its ability to exfoliate dead skin cells, and give the skin a deep-clean feel.

However, two plaintiffs, Kaylee Browning and Sarah Basile have filed a class action lawsuit in the United States District Court in central California against Unilever United States Inc., the parent company of St. Ives.

The plaintiffs claim that the exfoliating ingredients of the scrub include crushed walnut shells which could have a damaging effect on the skin. They balk at the use of "dermatologist tested" on the label and added that it is unfit to be sold or used as a facial scrub

The plaintiff asserts that no dermatologist would recommend the scrub and insisted the company should disclose that the scrub can cause microscopic tearing of the skin. They are seeking $5 million as damages, according to Today.

That seems hard to believe considering the scrub's loyal following, but it is possible that some people may experience irritation, says Debra Jaliman, MD, a dermatologist based in New York City.

A spokesperson for Unilever noted that it is the company's practice not to comment on pending litigation. "We can say that for over 30 years, consumers have loved and trusted the St. Ives brand to refresh and revitalize their skin. We are proud to be America's top facial scrub brand and stand by our dermatologist-tested formula."

Dermatologists are not unanimous about the adverse effects or otherwise of Scrubs. The plaintiffs cite a New York magazine article where dermatologists debate scrubs, with one, Dr. Dennis Gross, claiming it is like using sandpaper on the face.  Others say it promotes healthy cell growth.

Dr. Apple Bodemer, assistant professor of dermatology at the University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health said when the scrubs are used appropriately they can remove keratin plugs associated with acne and boost collagen production, thus making the skin to look healthy and smooth.

But he does not recommend it as he stated that he generally do not feel that anyone needs an exfoliant. He added that he believes that gentle cleansing by using the fingers helps the skin flake off.

The lawsuit also asserts that the St. Ives scrub is not really non-comedogenic, as it claims to be. But Dr. Jaliman said that claim does not make any sense as "This scrub does not have comedogenic ingredients" means it is specially formulated so it does not clog pores and is best for people who are acne-prone, according to People.

In conclusion, those who have been using the product and have not had a problem with it, then, there is no need to stop using it. But users might want to cut back if they wash with it daily as these types of scrubs should be used once or twice a week, which is about how long it takes the skin to turn over, Dr. Jaliman said.